November 10, 2021, 3-7 PM
Virtual Seminar: “The Mobile Archive Project”, November 10, 2021, 3-7 PMRegistration: https://www.uni-siegen.de/phil/anglistik/mobilearchives/ (Please register by November 9, 2021)
Keywords: archive, nationalism, colonial America, translation, historiography
Conference organizers: Markus Heide (Stiftung Universität Hildesheim, Germany), Thomas Hallock (University of South Florida St. Petersburg, USA), Marcel Hartwig (University of Siegen, Germany), Lenin Martell Gámez (Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Mexico).
Speakers: Martin Brückner, Hee Eun Kim, Victoria Sunnergren (University of Delaware); Edward Polanco (Virginia Tech); Will Glover (University of Michigan); Karen Kilcup and Catherine Bowlin (University of North Carolina Greensboro); Ilka Brasch (University of Hannover); Marcelo Jose Cabarcas Ortega (Fundación Universitaria Colombo Internacional); Kirsten Iden (University of South Carolina, Salkehatchie); Lenin Martell (UAEM) & Celeste González de Bustamante (University of Arizona); Steffi Dippold (Kansas State University); Sämi Ludwig (Université de Haute-Alsace); E. Thomson Shields (East Carolina University); Dominique Polanco (Virginia Tech)
Sponsors: Society of Early Americanists, Stiftung Universität Hildesheim, University of Siegen.
The Mobile Archive Project is an ongoing, flexible inquiry into the status of the archive in colonial and early American studies for our present day. In light of the global pandemic, plus economic fallout for universities and research communities sure to continue, the organizers take an open-ended approach to this project. We will convene in a series of online forums, hopefully with face-to-face meetings, towards the end goal of a published volume of essays.
In this one-day webinar, hosted by the University of Siegen, Germany, contributors will make short, ten-minute presentations, followed by responses from the project team/section leaders. The purpose of the opening webinar is to serve as a mutual introduction, and we hope, the future trajectory for continued collaboration. As we reflect upon the archive’s role in past early Americanist scholarship, our goal also is to provide a forum for the mentoring of emerging scholars.
The study of colonial America originated as a nationalistic, even patriotic enterprise. States, countries, municipalities, regions, and other groups (often geographically defined) established cultural genealogies, showing the “starting point” of an imagined political unit. With the rise of hemispheric, comparative, and transatlantic studies, however, these etiological narratives have come under scrutiny. Old continuities, once taken for granted, have been complicated, deepened, and enriched. The painful legacies of colonial violence–including enslavement, migration and removal–demand increased attention to how archival epistemologies carry colonial pasts into the present.
The attention to mobilities across time and space thus necessitates a critical look at one of the anchoring institutions in early American studies, the archive. Often established with a geographic basis, and usually bracketed by dates, the archival collection inevitably renders a given moment or object or angle of inquiry more relevant than others. Practicalities, of course, shape these decisions. Scholars travel to Pennsylvania to investigate Revolutionary Philadelphia, Massachusetts to understand Puritan New England, and so on. But how did archival materials themselves travel? Letters were sent, objects changed hands, spaces were imagined, entire collections would migrate over time. This mobility belies the instability of any claim to archival “rootedness.”
The time is ripe for reconsideration. Digitalization has challenged the locational grounding of early Americanist scholarship. Where scholars have always been encouraged to make physical contact with a given scholarly artifact, funding to the physical archive has diminished; at the same time, online scans are increasingly accessible. Travel restrictions due to a global pandemic, meanwhile, have pressed the issue of remote access into the realm of necessity.
How then should scholarship follow suit? Limited travel, and the possibilities opened by online access, necessitate a break in old practices. While archival research has long been regarded as the driver of innovation, access to collections has upheld institutional hierarchies. Gender, economic disparities, and geographic differences have played an overdetermined role in knowledge production. Increased attention to the living legacies of the colonial past, finally, demands greater attention to how our present-day past slips beyond set boundaries of space and time.
The inevitable restructuring of access and research challenges the role of the archive in a post-pandemic context. Will institutional access be restricted to digital environments only? What constitutes the allure of the archive, and how does it impact knowledge networks in historical and cultural studies? In what ways will material culture be accessible, and how will more unexpected connections unfold? Will future access remain bound to the monetization of digital resources and thus the purchasing power of research institutions? With renewed crossover between traditional and creative scholarship, how can silenced pasts be recovered alongside conventionally recorded and documented past?
Contact Email: email@example.com